• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Nucleics

  • PeakTrace
    • About PeakTrace
    • PeakTrace Online
    • PeakTrace Online Pro
    • PeakTrace 6
    • PeakTrace:Box
    • PeakTrace RP
    • PeakTrace for Chromas
    • Buy PeakTrace
    • Why use PeakTrace?
    • Validation of PeakTrace
    • PeakTrace FAQ
    • PeakTrace In Depth
  • DNA Sequencing Products
    • PeakTrace Basecaller
    • PeakTrace:Box
    • PeakTrace RP
    • PeakTrace for Chromas
    • QualTrace
    • LongTrace
    • CounterTrace
    • dLUTE SEQ
    • UniSeq
    • ASIN
  • Support & Services
    • PeakTrace Online Pro Registration
    • QualTrace III Online
    • DNA Sequencing Troubleshooting Guide
    • PeakTrace RP Downloads
    • PeakTrace:Box Downloads
    • Trace Viewers
    • User Manuals
    • Help Guides
      • How to Install Auto PeakTrace 6
      • How to Upgrade to Auto PeakTrace 6
      • How to Update the PeakTrace License on Linux
      • How to Generate a cmDust File
      • Online Activation of Auto PeakTrace 6
      • Auto PeakTrace 6 Online Activation Guide
      • DNA Sequencing Protocols
        • DNA Sequencing Protocol Tips
        • Exonuclease I – Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase Clean Up of PCR Products
        • Tris EDTA DNA Sequencing Resuspension Buffer
        • DNA Sequencing Reaction Clean-up using Phenol & Butanol
    • DNA Sequencing Service Reviews
    • Software Downloads
    • MSDS
    • Services
      • Genomics Sequencing
      • Bioinformatics
  • Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • PeakTrace Basecaller Forum
    • PeakTrace:Box Forum
    • Auto PeakTrace RP Forum
    • QualTrace Forum
    • DNA Sequencing Forum
    • DNA Sequencing Software
    • PCR Forum
    • DNA Isolation Forum
    • LongTrace Forum
    • dLUTE SEQ Forum
  • About
    • Contact
    • News
    • Jobs
    • Nucleics Privacy Policy
Buy PeakTrace

Comparison of KB with phred

Home › Forums › DNA Sequencing Forum › Comparison of KB with phred

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by Daniel.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • September 7, 2015 at 12:55 pm #3188
      Daniel
      Keymaster

      This is a paper that was published some time ago which found that while KB gave longer read lengths when using predicted quality scores, it did not provide any increases when used for alignment.

      A direct comparison of the KB™ Basecaller and phred for identifying the bases from DNA sequencing using chain termination chemistry
      http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/257
      Abstract
      Background
      Relatively recently, the software KB™ Basecaller has replaced phred for identifying the bases from raw sequence data in DNA sequencing employing dideoxy chemistry. We have measured quantitatively the consequences of that change.

      Results
      The high quality sequence segment of reads derived from the KB™ Basecaller were, on average, 30-to-50 bases longer than reads derived from phred. However, microbe identification appeared to have been unaffected by the change in software.

      Conclusions
      We have demonstrated a modest, but statistically significant, superiority in high quality read length of the KB™ Basecaller compared to phred. We found no statistically significant difference between the numbers of microbial species identified from the sequence data.

      We actually looked into why this occurred around 10 years ago when we first introduced our LongTrace basecaller. The cause is surprising – while KB actually is a better basecaller than phred, a lot of the increased Q20+ bases come from pockets of high quality bases within low quality regions. These high quality bases prevent programs like phrap from being able to align the reads as they create high quality mismatches in the consensus sequence. The end result is that you get more Q20+ bases, but you don’t get any improvement in the alignments.

      PeakTrace does not suffer from this effect and actually aligns better than would be expected from the read length alone. The reason for this is in comparison to KB and phred PeakTrace makes fewer indel errors (i.e. missing or inserting extra bases). Indel errors make aligning sequences difficult since they are heavily penalised in the alignment algorithms.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

DNA Sequencing Help

We have added a guide on troubleshooting automated DNA sequencing problems.

DNA Sequencing Service Facilities Reviews

Please see our review of 325 DNA sequencing core facilities and commercial services for more information on selecting the right sequencing service for your needs.

QualTrace III Online

Try the free online version of the QualTrace DNA sequencing QC software and see how real time quality control tracking can improve your read lengths and lower sequencing failure rates.

Contact Details

email. information@nucleics.com
phone. +61 3 9016 9373
  • home
  • peaktrace
  • software & reagents
  • forum
  • tools
  • services
  • support
  • about

Nucleics

Sanger Seqencing Software

©Nucleics 1999 - 2026